Complicated
math was used to define nature in the past, but when the behavior is being
observed we found out more complex then math and could not be done. Until, Stephen
developed mathematical. Mathematica, this program allowed Stephen to continuously
run simple mathematical equations, repetitiously which in turn would form
complex structures. What was an amazing discovery that it does not take complex
mathematics to form complex forms but simple organized mathematical patterns to
form nature’s similar complex shapes and arrangements. Yet again these are just
similar models that end up having a definite shape and arrangement in its
totality. Nature on the other hand has infinite shapes and arrangements within
the same time continuum. Stephen talked about how, how is something changed and
what gets changed or transformed first when the development of the snow flake,
is it the extension of the arm or the release of energy that impedes the
formation of crystal at that point of construction. Those where some
interesting points, I can almost say just like the age old question of what
came first the chicken or the egg? In observation of the phenomenon of these
formations, who is to say that the mere fact that during that observation, the
forms the observer is not in some way altering the formation it’s self. The
heat that the object forms, to the coolness that is controlled, and many other
different factors, like the electron when viewed, can alter the pattern, time
of formation and its structure. This also brings to question the observers
opinion on the actual occurrence and time line. In any case the development of
Mathematica and the discovery and revelation of how a simple our completed
natural environment and beyond are, is amazing.
No comments:
Post a Comment